Originally Posted by
Stephen Coates
...even though it doesn't render them 'correctly', look much better in IBrowse.
A great contradiction in that statement Steve!
If it doesn't render pages correctly then they do not look as intended by their developer/author. IBrowse has become too out of date to support current Web2 technology and so is not a viable web browser in most peoples view.
Originally Posted by
Stephen Coates
I don;t see what difference the RSS logo makes. Safari's is much more meaningful to people who don't have a clue what RSS is.
As for close buttons, that is just a minor thing. All web browsers would be the same if everything was in the same location on each one, which would defeat the point in there being more than one web browser available.
The whole point of a "standard" is that is remains standard on all sites that use it. The RSS logo is a standard used to represent RSS. Using a different one does seem rather strange. Maybe Safari have been excluded from being allowed to use the official one!
I do however agree with your last statement Steve (which is rare for me
). The whole point of choice is to give the end user variety so they can choose what they like the most and what suits there way of working. No two people like exactly the same in life.