but look, emissions are a nice move to production cars, not F1. I don't give a s*** if 20 cars put a lot co2 into air, i want to see 200 every day car million doing that. Not 20 top sport cars...producing a lot less CO2 emissions
I don't agree with that mate, top performance series cars, Like Ferrari, Lambos, Martins, use V8 or V12 Engines. They have a great tradition of that kind of big engines.12, V10 and V8 engines are dinosaurs of the old world.
Well not quite the same, 2013 they had around 750, this year around 650. only with kers they should have more power. But overall less then last year. Bit still impressive how a V6 1600cc can do that. More impressive is top Speed, in tests they went to +330 km/h in same circuit that last year only went to 315...this year's 1.6 litre F1 engines are producing the same BHP as last year's 2.4 litre V8s
DRS has a bigger area on wing this year that will give bigger top speeds and acceleration.
I do understand the tech point of view that you talk about, but you have to spend a lot of money in that. In the other hand one pf the reasons they say engines are smaller is to be less expensive for lower teams. So we have 2 ideas that crash each other.
Tech = more money
small engines = less money
but changing engines every 1 or 2 years is not a solution... since you have a new engine you should keep then for longer time
If you already had good V10 engines, why change them? You spent a lot of money with that. To reduce Speed? There are other ways to reduce it.
And look at the noise the engines do.... looks like a 125cc bike...



Reply With Quote



