Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: GAAE vs 68K

  1. #1
    Retro Addict Administrator
    My location

    Burger Time Champion, Sonic Champion Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    15,588
    Blog Entries
    1
    Downloads
    6
    Uploads
    14

    GAAE vs 68K

    At the moment I've got ClassicWB GAAE installed on my A600 with KS3.1/1.3 (rom switcher), with 2MB chip + 2MB Fast ram and a 6GB HDD.

    What advantages, other than being WB3.1 rather than 2.1, would switching to 68K rather than GAAE give to the A600? Would it effect WHDGame compatibility? Or anything else?

    What are the main software differences between the 2 packages? Does the 68K version contain everything the GAAE version had?

    If you haven't played a classic game in years, it's never too late to start!


  2. #2
    For those who dare! ClassicWB dev
    VIP
    Forum Mod
    Chopper Challenge Champion, The Collector Champion, BombJack Arcade Champion, Turkey Shoot Champion, Paintballing - Assault Champion, Tower 13 - Adventures In Body Saving Champion, Himalayaya Champion, Sea Dogs Champion, Yeti Sports 1- Long Shot Version Champion, Operation Switchover Champion Bloodwych's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    601
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    It's a hard one this and it's down to user preference.

    The 2.1 Workbench setup has a lot of character and suits an A600 better in my opinion, with the Amidock bar and addictive games that came from Paul the Green Amiga Alien which are exclusive to this version, but if you have a 3.1 ROM then it's a shame to not make use of it. You could try and setup some kind of double boot!

    Obviously Workbench 3.1 does have better features and some more advanced software and setup. It should also run slightly faster in higher colour screenmodes (16) I think - not too sure on that one as I've never tested. All I know is Workbench 2.1 is SLOW in 16 colours, but not sure if that's down to the CPU and ECS chipset. For playing games and basic use, both Workbenches compare in a very similar fashion. Many of my Workbenches from the GAAE -> LITE have a very similar feel, setup and functionality for the common tasks.

    However, Workbench 3.1 has a much wider choice of software available to it on Aminet, so you may be able to customize it further. As far as WHDLoad goes, it won't make a lot of difference which you run.

    Last shout goes down to mem usage - I think it's higher in the Workbench 3.1 pack. Bottom line is WinUAE is the best tool to decide for yourself. ClassicWB GAAE was built ground up for an A600 - 68K was back engineered from the A1200 LITE version. Both work well.
    Last edited by Bloodwych; 28th May 2010 at 17:44.
    Live Long and Procrastinate
    A500 Batman Pack
    Classic Workbench

Similar Threads

  1. Suggestions for classicWB GAAE
    By Harrison in forum ClassicWB
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 31st October 2008, 16:04

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright classicamiga.com