Poll: What type of combat system do you prefer?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Retro Addict Administrator
    My location

    Burger Time Champion, Sonic Champion Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    16,662
    Blog Entries
    1
    Downloads
    6
    Uploads
    14

    Which combat system do you prefer?

    The turn based combat system was originally invented for video games as a way to easily manage combat situations within RPG and RTS style games when computers didn't really have the processing power to handle the battles in real time.

    However that has now changed. Today's computers and consoles can easily process a battle, no matter how large, in real time. However this introduces a lot of problems in itself for the player. In a turn based system the player can easily micro manage each aspect of the battle for each turn without having to worry about something happening during the selection of their next actions. In contrast, with a real-time battle system everything is constantly happening and you do not have the time to consider possible next moves.

    Each has something going for it though. With Turn Based combat you can really play around with everything available and experiment, creating routines in certain battles, and then watch them being played out. Whereas in real-time combat you get the sense of being a part of the action, with your adrenaline level increasing as the combat intensifies, giving you a sense of being there.

    Different people prefer one or the other. There is also a third system which is a hybrid of the two. Real-time combat that can be paused to manage your characters, then unpaused to continue. Games such as Baldur's Game and Dungeon Siege use this style of combat system and I like this the most. Being able to fight in real-time, but when everything is getting too much, or you lose track of certain events within a battle you can kill the space bar, pausing the action, and then take a few moments to move around the battle and analyse things, selecting the next actions for your characters, then unpausing and continuing with the selected actions played out.

    And more games are using this real-time with pause style of combat these days. Fallout 3 is a good example of one of the latest games to do this, with you being able to pause time to select and taget areas of an enemy, before unpausing and watching your weapon's ammo hit home.

    So which combat system do you prefer? And why?

    If you haven't played a classic game in years, it's never too late to start!


  2. #2
    C64 addict Staff Moderator
    My location

    Demon Cleaner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Phobos
    Posts
    7,664
    Downloads
    7
    Uploads
    88
    I like them all, although it depends of the genre of the game of course. In RPGs I prefer turn based, making the gameplay less hectic.

  3. #3
    Burn! Hot Blooded Rhythm Soul! Staff Moderator
    My location

    J T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    'STRAYA (since 2010)
    Posts
    2,054
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0
    Depends on the system too, I've really enjoyed turn based play in games like Advance Wars and Civ Rev on the DS. It's ideal for a handheld as it can be put down for a moment while you f.ex get on the train or take a seat, also the smaller nature might make real time a bit fiddly.

    I've not played many real-time ones I have to admit.

  4. #4
    The Darth Popsicle! VIP
    Bug Champion Sharingan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Olanda!
    Posts
    1,083
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I've got to admit that traditional turn based gameplay is becoming a little bit ... stale. Real time combat is quite simply more exciting, dynamic and chaotic - provided the pace isn't too fast. Star Ocean TTEOT was a bit of a nightmare at times because of the break-neck speed. Parasite Eve's combat system was spot-on, I thought.

  5. #5
    C64 addict Staff Moderator
    My location

    Demon Cleaner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Phobos
    Posts
    7,664
    Downloads
    7
    Uploads
    88
    I really enjoyed real time in the very beginning, first RTS I played on the PC were Warcraft and Command & Conquer. Then I was truly amazed when playing Warcraft 2 and suddenly there was a floud of RTS coming out, just one after the other. I mostly enjoyed Total Annihalation and the first Age of Empires, and 1 year later, I almost totally gave up playing RTS because they bored me, it was always the same.

    And nowadays I can't play them anymore because my PC wouldn't run them properly, but I don't care, I discovered console RPG games

  6. #6
    I am Legion for we are many. Staff Member
    My location

    Buleste's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Staffordshire Moorlands
    Posts
    4,079
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0
    I prefer the Big Stick Wrapped Round Chav's Head reality combat system.
    A1200 Power Tower
    OS 3.9 / CGX4 / OS4.0
    Blizzard 210Mhz (overclocked to 266Mhz) 603e PPC with 25Mhz 040 (Overclocked to 33Mhz) 256Mb RAM
    ZIV
    CV64/3D
    3.2Gb HDD + 20GB HDD

  7. #7
    Dangerous Inactive Member
    woody.cool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Northampton UK
    Posts
    412
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I prefer Real Time combat myself. However, I'm not that big on RPGs

  8. #8
    Amiga PT user VIP
    My location

    Tiago's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Estoril/Lisbon
    Posts
    2,419
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Both, it depends of what kind of game you play.
    I remenber UFO and the clones after it, they could very nice, but the "turn" system has to be well done to avoid monotony (is that the word is english? monoty = thing that repats a lot of times?) i think if you could get both in the same game could be the best solution
    A500 - A600 - A1200

  9. #9
    Retro Addict Administrator
    My location

    Burger Time Champion, Sonic Champion Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    16,662
    Blog Entries
    1
    Downloads
    6
    Uploads
    14
    You got it right the first time. Monotony.

    If you haven't played a classic game in years, it's never too late to start!


  10. #10
    C64 addict Staff Moderator
    My location

    Demon Cleaner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Phobos
    Posts
    7,664
    Downloads
    7
    Uploads
    88
    Oops just saw that this one is in the RPG section, so then it's clear, I prefer turn based combat. Can I undo my vote?

Similar Threads

  1. Which WinUAE frontend do you prefer?
    By Harrison in forum Games
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 29th January 2008, 00:32
  2. Astronomy New Solar System discovered
    By Harrison in forum General Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 6th November 2007, 23:12
  3. System afterlife
    By Harrison in forum General Chat
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 30th August 2007, 22:13
  4. Which default smilies do you prefer?
    By Harrison in forum Feedback and FAQs
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 9th January 2007, 20:04
  5. Which system will see emulators first?
    By Harrison in forum Modern era (7th Gen onwards)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 4th January 2007, 14:07

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright classicamiga.com